♟️ L Game Thinking: Strategic Minimalism

♟️ L Game Thinking: Strategic Minimalism


Malta Short Let: Cozy Stay in Gzira
Sliema Area
Modern Designer Finished
2 Bedrooms + Games Room.
First floor with Maltese Balcony
Large back Terrace with swinging sofa
Fully Airconditioned + Full Kitchen
3 TVs, including 65” with backlight.
Apartment Image
Book Now:
Google Travel | Direct (Cheapest) | Booking.com | Airbnb

How a Minimalist Game by a Maltese Genius Teaches Strategic Mastery

In 1968, Edward de Bono created what might be the world’s simplest strategic game. Using just a 4×4 board and two L-shaped pieces, he designed a game so minimal it could be learned in 30 seconds—yet so deep that no computer has ever solved it completely.

This wasn’t just a game. It was a profound lesson wrapped in play: the most powerful strategies often use the fewest possible elements to achieve maximum effect.

Today, as we drown in complexity—endless features, infinite options, overwhelming choices—de Bono’s L Game offers something revolutionary: a mental model for winning through reduction rather than addition.

Malta knows this truth intimately. With limited land, scarce water, and few natural resources, the island has thrived for millennia not by having more, but by doing more with less. The massive fortifications of Valletta weren’t built with endless resources but with strategic placement of finite stones. Each bastion positioned for maximum defensive value with minimum material.

While de Bono created the game, its core philosophy of thriving through limitation makes it a perfect ‘Maltese Mental Model’—a lens through which we can understand the island’s own strategic genius. This is L Game thinking: achieving strategic dominance through elegant minimalism.

Disclaimer: This article provides an educational analysis of strategic thinking principles derived from Dr. Edward de Bono’s L Game. The L Game and its strategic concepts are his intellectual property. This piece offers commentary and modern applications to encourage readers to explore de Bono’s original work. For the complete game and its philosophy, we encourage purchasing de Bono’s books on game thinking and strategy.

The Fundamental Insight: Most games—and most strategies—fail because they confuse complexity with sophistication. Chess has 32 pieces and billions of possible games. The L Game has 2 pieces and remains unbeaten. This isn’t coincidence; it’s design philosophy.Why Minimalism Wins: Every element you add to a system creates new interactions, new failure points, new confusion. But when you reduce to essence—to the minimum viable strategy—something magical happens: clarity emerges, decisions sharpen, and paradoxically, possibilities expand.

De Bono discovered that strategic thinking isn’t about having more options—it’s about having the right options.

🎮 Understanding the L Game: A Masterclass in Reduction

Before we extract the thinking principles, let’s understand the game itself:

The Setup:

  • A 4×4 grid (just 16 squares)
  • Two L-shaped pieces (each covering 4 squares)
  • Two neutral pieces (single squares each)
  • That’s it. The entire game.

The Rules:

  1. Players take turns moving their L-piece to any new position
  2. After moving, you may (optionally) move one neutral piece
  3. You win when your opponent cannot move their L

The Revelation: Despite having only 2,296 possible positions (compared to chess’s 10^120), the game remained strategically unsolved for decades. Even though computers have now “weakly solved” it, its principles of dynamic thinking are more relevant than ever.

🧠 The Six Principles of L Game Thinking

Now let’s explore the deeper principles that make the MINIMAL framework so powerful:

Principle 1: Constraint Creates Creativity

With infinite options, we paradoxically create less. With elegant constraints, genius emerges.

Unlimited Options Lead To… Strategic Constraints Create…
Analysis paralysis Decisive action
Feature creep Elegant solutions
Resource waste Maximum efficiency
Confused users Intuitive experiences

Real-World Application: Twitter’s original 140-character limit didn’t restrict communication—it revolutionized it. By forcing brevity, it created a new art form and changed global discourse. The constraint WAS the innovation.

📋 Your Move : As part of your L Game training, map the essential elements in your current project. What constraints could become creative catalysts?

Principle 2: Position Beats Possession

In the L Game, you don’t win by having more pieces—you win by better positioning. This mirrors de Bono’s broader insight: strategic advantage comes from configuration, not accumulation.

Business Example: The Boutique Hotel RevolutionLarge hotel chains competed by adding more—more rooms, more amenities, more locations. Then boutique hotels applied L Game thinking:

  • Instead of 500 rooms: 30 perfectly designed ones
  • Instead of 10 restaurants: One exceptional dining experience
  • Instead of everywhere: The perfect location

Result: Higher rates, better margins, fiercer loyalty. Position beat possession.

Principle 3: Space Is More Valuable Than Stuff

The L Game’s deepest insight: the empty squares matter more than the filled ones. Control space, and you control possibility.

The Apple Store PhenomenonTraditional electronics retailers crammed every inch with products. Apple did the opposite:

  • Vast open spaces
  • Few products, perfectly displayed
  • Room to think, breathe, experience

The space WAS the strategy. Sales per square foot: 10x the competition.

Principle 4: Flexibility Trumps Strength

The L-piece’s power isn’t its size—it’s its ability to reshape, to adapt, to flow into new configurations. Fixed strength loses to flexible positioning.

Fixed Strength Strategy L Game Flexibility Real-World Example
Build the biggest factory Build modular capacity Tesla’s adaptable production
Hire 1000 specialists Hire 50 polymaths Netflix’s lean teams
Perfect one product Platform for variations Amazon Web Services

Principle 5: Winning Happens in the Negative Space

You don’t win the L Game by crushing your opponent—you win by quietly arranging conditions where they defeat themselves. This is strategic aikido: using minimal energy to redirect maximum force.

Case Study: Southwest AirlinesWhile competitors fought over luxury features, Southwest applied L Game thinking:

  • Removed: Assigned seats, meals, multiple aircraft types
  • Result: Faster turnarounds, lower costs, higher reliability
  • Competitors: Trapped by their own complexity

Southwest didn’t attack—they simply positioned themselves where competitors couldn’t follow without destroying their own business models.

Principle 6: The Best Move Changes the Game

In the L Game, great moves don’t just improve your position—they transform the entire strategic landscape. One placement can shift the game from defensive to offensive, from closed to open.

💡 Strategic Insight: Don’t just play within the game—play WITH the game. The most powerful moves redefine what’s possible.

🏗️ The MINIMAL Framework: Your L Game Strategy Guide

Before diving into the principles, here’s your practical roadmap for applying L Game thinking to any strategic situation:

M – Map the Essential Elements

  • What are the absolute minimum pieces needed?
  • Which elements are core vs. decoration?
  • Use Simplicity principles to identify essence

I – Identify the Spaces

  • Where are the empty spaces in your market/problem?
  • What aren’t competitors doing?
  • Apply Water Logic to see where value could flow

N – Neutralize Complexity

  • What can you remove without losing function?
  • Which features are actually friction?
  • Use PMI analysis (listing Plus, Minus, and Interesting points) on every element

I – Iterate Positions

  • How can you reconfigure existing assets?
  • What new arrangements are possible?
  • Apply Lateral Thinking to find unexpected configurations

M – Maximize Flexibility

  • Build adaptability into your core
  • Preserve options, don’t commit prematurely
  • Use APC thinking (exploring Alternatives, Possibilities, and Choices) to maintain strategic options

A – Arrange for Opponent Constraints

  • How can your positioning limit competitor options?
  • Create conditions where competing is disadvantageous
  • Apply Sur/petition thinking (creating new value spaces)

L – Lock in Strategic Advantage

  • Secure positions that are hard to attack
  • Build switching costs through elegance, not complexity
  • Use C&S thinking (examining Consequences and Sequels) to project long-term positions

🎯 Real-World L Game Victories

Case 1: Craigslist – The Minimalist Giant

The Situation: Classified ads were moving online in the 1990s. Competitors built elaborate sites with advanced features.

L Game Strategy:

  • Minimalist design that hasn’t changed in 25 years
  • No images in most categories
  • Simple text listings
  • Virtually no staff relative to volume

Result: Destroyed the newspaper classified business. Remains dominant despite “better” competitors. The simplicity IS the moat.

Case 2: WhatsApp – 55 Employees, $19 Billion

The Situation: Messaging apps competed on features—stickers, games, social networks.

L Game Strategy:

  • Just messaging. Nothing else.
  • No ads, no games, no feed
  • Tiny team, massive scale
  • Simplicity as identity

Result: 450 million users with 55 employees when Facebook acquired them. Maximum value, minimum complexity.

Case 3: In-N-Out Burger – The Anti-Growth Growth Story

The Situation: Fast food chains compete through massive menus and global expansion.

L Game Strategy:

  • Menu: Burgers, fries, shakes. Period.
  • Expansion: Slow, controlled, regional
  • Quality: Uncompromised through simplicity
  • Operations: Refined to perfection

Result: Highest revenue per store in fast food. Cult following. Proof that less can dominate more.

⚡ L Game Thinking vs. Traditional Strategy

Traditional Strategic Thinking L Game Thinking The Shift
Add resources to win Position resources to win From quantity to configuration
Complex plans for complex problems Simple moves for any problem From complication to clarity
Protect everything Protect what matters From paranoia to focus
Win by overwhelming Win by outmaneuvering From force to finesse
Success through features Success through space From addition to subtraction

❗ The Dangers of Misapplying L Game Thinking

Warning: Minimalism Isn’t Absence

The Trap: Confusing strategic minimalism with doing less work. L Game thinking requires MORE thought to achieve less complexity. It’s harder to write a short letter than a long one.

The Danger: Removing essential elements in the name of simplicity. Every element in the L Game serves multiple purposes. Random reduction creates weakness, not strength.

The Solution: Test every removal. Use PMI analysis on what you’re eliminating. If removing something reduces strategic options disproportionately, it’s load-bearing.

🔗 L Game Synergies with Other de Bono Tools

L Game thinking amplifies every other strategic tool:

Tool Combination How They Reinforce
Six Hats + L Game Black Hat identifies minimum viable concerns; Green Hat finds elegant reconfigurations
Simplicity + L Game Simplicity removes excess; L Game positions the remainder for maximum effect
Lateral Thinking + L Game Lateral thinking finds new configurations; L Game evaluates strategic potential
Sur/petition + L Game Sur/petition creates new games; L Game ensures you win with minimal resources
Water Logic + L Game Water logic reveals flows; L Game positions to control them minimally

🤖 L Game Thinking in the AI Age

As AI handles complexity, human strategic advantage shifts to L Game thinking:

Why L Game Thinking Matters More Now:

1. AI Amplifies Complexity: AI can manage infinite features and options. But users crave simplicity. The winners will use AI to enable L Game strategies—maximum impact through minimum interface.

2. Positioning Over Processing: AI can process faster than humans. But positioning—choosing WHERE to apply that processing—remains deeply human. L Game thinking guides AI power.

3. The Flexibility Imperative: AI makes pivoting easier but also more necessary. L Game structures—minimal, flexible, reconfigurable—adapt faster than complex systems.

4. Space Creation: As AI fills every computational niche, the valuable spaces become those AI can’t occupy—human connection, meaning, purpose. L Game thinking finds these spaces.

AI Excels At… L Game Thinkers Excel At…
Managing complexity Eliminating complexity
Optimizing within constraints Redefining constraints
Processing all options Creating option spaces
Tactical execution Strategic positioning

🎮 Your L Game Training Program

Step 1: Learn to See Space

  • □ List everything in your current project/business
  • □ Identify what’s NOT there (the spaces)
  • □ Ask: Which spaces have strategic value?
  • □ Use CAF to ensure you see all spaces

Step 2: Practice Reduction

  • □ Take any complex system you manage
  • □ Remove one element each day
  • □ Note: What still works? What breaks?
  • □ Apply PMI to each removal

Step 3: Explore Reconfiguration

  • □ Take your minimum viable elements
  • □ Find 5 new ways to arrange them
  • □ Test each configuration’s strategic potential
  • □ Use Lateral Thinking for wild reconfigurations

Step 4: Design for Flexibility

  • □ Identify your most rigid structures
  • □ Redesign for easy reconfiguration
  • □ Build in pivot points
  • □ Apply Water Logic to enable flow

Step 5: Create Strategic Locks

  • □ Map competitor constraints
  • □ Position to maximize their limitations
  • □ Secure spaces they can’t enter
  • □ Use Sur/petition thinking

Step 6: Play Actual L Games

  • □ Apply L Game thinking to real decisions
  • □ Document your moves and reasoning
  • □ Review: Did minimalism win?
  • □ Iterate and improve

🌍 L Game Thinking: The Maltese Mastery

Malta embodies L Game thinking at a national level. Unable to compete on size, the island nation positioned itself strategically:

  • Not the biggest EU nation → The most strategically located
  • Not the most resources → The most efficient use of resources
  • Not the most space → The most valuable space
  • Not the most options → The right options

Malta doesn’t win by having more—it wins by positioning what it has for maximum strategic advantage. Every policy, every development, every decision follows L Game logic: minimal resources, maximum impact.

🏁 Your L Game Begins Now

In a world obsessed with more—more features, more options, more complexity—L Game thinking offers a radical alternative: win through strategic minimalism.

This isn’t about doing less. It’s about achieving more with less. It’s about recognizing that in strategy, as in the L Game itself, the winner isn’t who has the most pieces—it’s who positions them best.

🎯 Your First Move: Choose one area where you’re currently competing through addition—more features, more effort, more resources. Apply L Game thinking: What’s the minimum configuration that could dominate? What spaces could you create by removing rather than adding?

Start now: Look at your calendar for tomorrow. Find one meeting. What is one agenda item you can remove to make it 20% shorter and 100% more effective? That’s your first L Game victory.

Remember de Bono’s profound insight: “Complexity is easy. Simplicity is difficult. But simplicity with strategic depth—that’s mastery.”

The board is set. The pieces are minimal. Your move.

What game-changing reduction will you make today?


Ready to spread strategic thinking throughout your organization? Discover how Teaching Thinking can help others master L Game principles, or explore our complete guide to Maltese Mental Models for the full strategic toolkit.

Navigation: ← Previous: Sur/petition | Series Start | Next: Teaching Thinking →Part of the Maltese Mental Models series • Teaching Edward de Bono’s thinking tools for the AI age

Disclaimer: This article provides an educational analysis of strategic thinking principles derived from Dr. Edward de Bono’s L Game. The L Game and its strategic concepts are his intellectual property. This piece offers commentary and modern applications to encourage readers to explore de Bono’s original work. For the complete game and its philosophy, we encourage purchasing de Bono’s books on game thinking and strategy.